Monday, June 23, 2008

Talented?


My wife found this link to a gallery of paintings and sketches by possibly the most evil monster ever to walk the earth, Adolf Hitler. Take a look at them and see what you think.

My opinion is that he had some aptitude for art, but it was nothing outstanding, a fact which his fragile ego couldn't handle. So, instead of perhaps bettering his technique and developing a unique style, he turned his back on artistic improvement and parlayed the blame-game into a political platform. This just happened to coincide with a country/people down on its luck and eager to re-inflate its own opinion of itself (of course, it did get a raw deal [thanks to the vindictive French, emboldened by its American ally] at the end of WWI, but that's another post for a point far in the future, if ever).

What would have become of the moron had he been born just ten years earlier? Most likely he would have never amounted to much, and he probably would have come to the same end: suicide.

Take care.
DAL357

Saturday, June 21, 2008

My tip for mankind


We're all adults here, right? If you don't indulge in the following practice at least once in a while, I'd be stunned. Now I have empirical evidence as to why you should just stop it.

Would you like to gain the upper hand on that bane of mankind's existence, the common cold? Simply do the following: Do not, under any circumstances, pick your nose, or put any of your digits near your nostrils.

NEVER, EVER.

Even if you've just thoroughly washed your hands and underneath your nails, you can't ever be sure that each and every cold-causing microbe is gone, so don't do the digital-nasal probe. Use tissues or toilet paper (preferably unused) to clear/clean your nose, and nothing else.

Without going into all of the details, I decided to do this last fall, and except for a very minor scratchy throat this spring, I did not get sick last winter, even though my son got several colds during the same period.

No need to thank me; I'm happy to help. Try it yourself and see the difference.

Take care.
DAL357

My first funnel cloud


While doing some work on the rental house we own and will be putting up for sale soon (good luck on that, right?), my wife, son, nephew and I saw our first authentic funnel cloud! It was not very big (click here to see a video), but darned if it wasn't the real McCoy, with cloud rotation to boot. We were apparently a few miles away from it, but from the looks of the video, it happened within a couple of blocks of where my father lives.

Take care.
DAL357

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Guns, unfortunately, don't always save lives


What follows is a horribly sad story. The only part of it with even a whit of good was the swift way the officer dispatched the perpetrator.

*****

Calif. police ID man they say fatally beat toddler Tue Jun 17, 2:29 AM ET

Police on Monday identified a man [a man in only the strictest biological sense; this was no man] who was fatally shot by an officer for allegedly refusing to stop beating a toddler to death along a remote road.

Sergio Casian Aguilar, 27, parked his truck on an unlit road Saturday night, removed a 2-year-old boy from his car seat and proceeded to stomp, kick and punch the boy to death, authorities said. The boy was unrecognizable when he was pronounced dead at Emanuel Medical Center, the Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department said.

Authorities have not released the boy's name but say they believe he was Aguilar's son. The Stanislaus County coroner and the California Department of Justice are testing DNA to confirm the relationship.

Several motorists called 911 and tried to stop the beating, authorities said. [Apparently, none of them carried a gun. Of course, we are talking about California. I wasn't there, but what about a tire iron? This probably happened so quickly and was so shocking that people were stunned into effete gestures of intervention. In another story, I read he pushed away those who tried to restrain him and went back to beating the child to death.]

Dan Robinson, a local volunteer fire department chief, told The Modesto Bee that at first glance, he thought the child was a dead animal in the road. He said when he realized it was a child, he tried to stop Aguilar.

He said Aguilar had a "total hollowness in his eyes" and talked calmly of the boy being filled with "demons."

Witness Lisa Mota told the San Francisco Chronicle that Aguilar told people who tried to stop him that the boy was "trash."

Responding to 911 calls, a Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department helicopter landed in a dairy pasture near the scene. A Modesto police officer, Jerry Ramar, fatally shot Aguilar after he failed to heed the officer's warning to stop beating the child, authorities said. Aguilar flashed his middle finger at Ramar before Ramar shot him in the forehead [YES!], police said.

"I have never seen anything like that before and I hope I never have to again," Ramar said of the beating.

Authorities have not released the name of the boy's mother.

Aguilar had no previous criminal history, police said. Results of toxicology tests on Aguilar are expected in four weeks.

Ramar has been placed on paid administrative leave, a routine response for officer-involved shootings.

Copyright © 2008 The Associated Press.

*****

Even though I know things like this happen numerous times a year, it still sickens my soul to read about them.

Concerning the puke who murdered this toddler, likely his son, he got what deserved, albeit too late. Unfortunately, guns don't always save lives, but sometimes they do deal righteous justice.

Take care.
DAL357

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Hardcore survivalism


So, you think you're a hardcore survivalist? Have you made up a few of these, assuming, of course, you have one or more members of the fairer sex in your party? I don't know about you, but I consider this a pretty darn good idea for extended societal problems that might disrupt supplies of personal hygiene items, along with last year's Yellow Pages (crinkle first for maximum utility and comfort--I speak from experience) for another task in that vicinity of the body that both sexes are heir to.

BTW, here's the how-to link.

Take care.
DAL357

P.S. Just in case some thin-skinned individuals might take umbrage to the above, I may have written it in a light-hearted manner, but it is a subject that should be thought of as carefully as food, water, guns and ammo, etc.

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Peek-a-boo(bs)


If you thought there was no silver lining to the continuing meltdown of the airline industry, think again. The fact that fewer people are flying on fewer airlines at rates soon to be prohibitive for all but the very well to do, means fewer American citizens will be subject to the following treatment.

*****

Scanners that see through clothing installed in US airports
Tue Jun 10, 5:11 PM ET


Security scanners which can see through passengers' clothing and reveal details of their body underneath are being installed in 10 US airports, the US Transportation Security Administration said Tuesday.

A random selection of travellers getting ready to board airplanes in Washington, New York's Kennedy, Los Angeles and other key hubs will be shut in the glass booths while a three-dimensional image is made of their body beneath their clothes.

The booths close around the passenger and emit "millimeter waves" that go through cloth to identify metal, plastics, ceramics, chemical materials and explosives, according to the TSA.

While it allows the security screeners -- looking at [and rating?] the images in a separate room -- to clearly see the passenger's sexual organs as well as other details of their bodies, the passenger's face is blurred [oh, okay then], TSA said in a statement on its website.

The scan only takes seconds and is to replace the physical pat-downs of people that is currently widespread in airports.

TSA began introducing the body scanners in airports in April, first in the Phoenix, Arizona terminal.

The installation is picking up this month, with machines in place or planned for airports in Washington (Reagan National and Baltimore-Washington International), Dallas, Las Vegas, Albuquerque, Miami and Detroit.

But the new machines have provoked worries among passengers and rights activists.

"People have no idea how graphic the images are," Barry Steinhardt, director of the technology and liberty program at the American Civil Liberties Union, told AFP.

The ACLU said in a statement that passengers expecting privacy underneath their clothing "should not be required to display highly personal details of their bodies such as evidence of mastectomies, colostomy appliances, penile implants, catheter tubes and the size of their breasts or genitals as a pre-requisite to boarding a plane."

Besides masking their faces, the TSA says on its website, the images made "will not be printed stored or transmitted." [At least not directly. Hey, TSA, ever hear of cell phones with cameras?]

"Once the transportation security officer has viewed the image and resolved anomalies [With what, a gloved hand?], the image is erased from the screen permanently [but not from the memory of a TSA officer]. The officer is unable to print, export, store or transmit the image." [They will, however, be allowed to make allusions to the size of passengers' body parts using cupped hands held chest high or the right and left forefingers held varying distances apart.]

Lara Uselding, a TSA spokeswoman, added that passengers are not obliged to accept the new machines [just as we are not obliged to let them board].

"The passengers can choose between the body imaging and the pat-down," [Heck of a choice there, much like being given the choice to be probed with or without a glove.] she told AFP.

TSA foresees 30 of the machines installed across the country by the end of 2008 [this makes the big assumption that there still will be airports to need them]. In Europe, Amsterdam's Schipol airport is already [inappropriately] using the scanners.

*****

This is just one more in a slew of reasons why I haven't flown in nearly 10 years. Flying used to be an enjoyable experience, but it sounds like too much hassle to bother with anymore. Oh well, I've seen a good portion of the world I want to see already, so it's not that big of a loss for me, and isn't it all about me? (Thank goodness my wife doesn't read my blog.)

Take care.
DAL357

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Liberty lost



If you’ve been paying attention during this presidential election cycle (come to think of it, ditto practically every other presidential election cycle in the last 20 years, at least), you have probably noticed folks with a Republican perspective urging a vote for McCain, not so much on his own merit, but as a vote against Obama. What a sad state of affairs.

Those same people who urge you to vote for McCain also say voting for a third-party candidate is tantamount to voting for Obama, as if voting for what you really believe in (usually actual liberty vs. ephemeral political promises that never materialize) is somehow treasonous. Yeah, that’s it. Millions of American soldiers fought and bled, and many thousands had their lives cut short, just so you could use your vote not for the candidate who offers liberty, but because he doesn’t suck as bad as the other guy. Your precious vote is just a pawn to run political interference.

I submit that those who vote this way are the real traitors to America and the ideals it purports to stand for. Voting in this way ensures we will continue to get more of what is essentially a non-choice in the future. Which of these two candidates really speaks for liberty? The answer, of course, is neither.

The founding fathers never intended, and when setting up the structure of our government, never envisioned or made provisions for political parties as we know them, although I’m sure they were aware of the concept. This was, and is, the Achilles heel of the U.S. Government, and it will destroy us in the end. (Actually, I believe it already has; we are just feeding on the carrion of past liberty, and that can’t last forever.)

The irrational factionalism we see today--where the group or party comes first, the country as a whole country be damned--is antithetical to liberty. Sure, it parades itself as honest debate, but that’s just for public consumption. It’s real aim is the acquisition and concentration of power from the people, who willingly give it every time they vote for any person who sees liberty as an antiquated idea.

Liberty is a simple concept; it doesn’t need much government apparatus to guarantee its continuation. A small, part-time government with the following features is all that’s necessary: a simple, easily-understood document stating inviolable rights, a court system to address/redress legitimate grievances between parties, a reasonable import/export tariff on trade (hey, money to run even a small government has to come from somewhere), and the wherewithal to protect its citizens from domestic or foreign force or fraud. This is the medium in which liberty reaches its full fruition. But where’s the payoff in that for those fractured souls known as power seekers?

What a wonderful world the above paragraph describes. America came close to this ideal long ago, much closer than any country in history ever has, although it never actually grasped it. It took its liberty for granted for so long it eventually lost it and will never regain it. So be it.

Take care.
DAL357

Saturday, June 7, 2008

Can this be far away?


Are you old enough to remember the 55 mph speed limit of the 1970s and 1980s? I suspect that somewhere, and probably not too far, down the line, those old speed limit signs are going to get dusted off and reinstalled nationwide. If this doesn't happen within the next three years or so, I'll be extremely surprised.

Take care.
DAL357

Simultaneously sick, sad, and funny


I found the following piece over on the Onion to be distrubing, yet funny. Will you see it the same way? Is it an anti-Iraq-war piece disguised as satire? You be the judge. Do I care whether or not you find it humorous? Not really. Report: Love Letters From U.S. Troops Increasingly Gruesome .

Take care.
DAL357

Friday, June 6, 2008

Nearly a lifetime ago


Don't forget that 64 years ago today, the long-awaited (especially by the Soviets) second European front was started in France by Allied forces against the Nazis. Historians can, and will, debate the significance of this event ad nauseam when compared to the massive battles of the Eastern front, but I'd rather look at it from a worm's-eye view. In other words, from the fighting man's perspective.

These young men went into battle not knowing what they were facing (to maintain secrecy, most were not even aware of where they were specifically headed until very late in the operation). They were scared and, no doubt, wished they were elsewhere, but they pushed themselves while facing the prospect of sudden death and achieved a slow, grinding victory against a tough, entrenched enemy.

Please pause today, if only for a moment, to give thanks to those courageous men who helped bring about the defeat of the evil, immoral Nazi empire.

Take care.
DAL357

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Don't be a dipstick: it's supply and demand


To those woefully ignorant of basic economics, please read the excerpts of the following essay with as open a mind as you can muster. In fact, you should probably read it in its entirety.

*****

Wishful Thinking, Speculation and Oil (May 30, 2008) by Charles Hugh Smith


Everyone and their sister seems to have jumped on the "oil prices are being driven by speculation" bandwagon, but perhaps that is nothing but wishful thinking. From the very beginning of futures trading--back in the 1600s when traders in Antwerp would buy and sell contracts on the cargo coming from the East Indies--the easiest game in town has been to blame speculators for price movements.

If the price of a commodity is rising, then the villains are speculators. If the price is dropping, it's the short sellers' fault.

Speculators are active wherever and whenever speculation is allowed. It's wishful thinking to expect oil will fall from $130/barrel back to $70/barrel if only those darned speculators would leave the market alone.

Note to hand-wringing, finger-pointing pundits: those darned speculators are the market.

*

As for the "solutions" to supply:

1. The Iranians have 20 supertankers filled with oil floating around somewhere. Nice, but it's heavy crude, and the few refineries able to process it are already running flat out. Also, 20 supertankers is a drop in the bucket of global demand.

2. Deep abiotic oil is abundant. The Russian have the technology. If the Russians have the technology, why is their production declining so rapidly? Where are the pipelines from their deep wells?

3. It's all the weak dollar. Once the dollar starts rising, the bubble in oil prices will pop. Then how come oil is rising in all currencies and even when priced in gold?

4. Canada and the U.S. have nearly unlimited supplies of shale oil and tar sands. Great, but real-world production will top out at 2.5 million barrels a day, about 10% of North America's consumption, and the process uses vast quantities of natural gas.

5. If only the tree-huggers would let us drill in the Alaska Wilderness. The U.S. consumes 22 million barrels a day or 8 billion barrels a year. The Alaskan North Slope everyone talks about contains about a billion barrels--a whopping 45 days' supply for the U.S. Whoopie.

In other words--it's all wishful thinking, folks: that it's all the speculators' fault, that new supplies will magically come on line and save us--there is simply no credible evidence for either supposition. It's supply and demand. Prices are set on the margin, and as a result a shortfall of a few percent has an amazing leverage on price.

Go ahead and ban speculation, and see what happens then. Prices will not drop, they will simply become more disorderly/chaotic.

As for demand destruction--let me know when China, India, Indonesia, Iran, Venezuela, Nigeria, Mexico et al. stop subsidizing the price of fossil fuels for their hundreds of millions of consumers.

And as for supply, let me know when global production of oil from any source exceeds 90 million barrels and day and keeps climbing as producers take advantage of the high prices.

*****

Those same people who believe this is a contrived crisis for the purposes of extracting the maximum amount of moola from the pockets of Americans often are also the ones who simultaneously detest government intervention and yet want government to do something so that they can continue living their cheap-oil lifestyle. One thing to remember is that "Big Oil" companies actually control a relatively small share of the marketplace relative to several decades ago, approx. <20%. The real players in the market are national oil companies where countries own the oil wealth: Russia, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, etc. They don't answer to shareholders, so they can do as they please, even if their actions contradict rational economic principles. Couple this with the apparent fact that there just isn't that much easily-pumped crude to meet demand (that's WORLDWIDE demand, not just American demand, which may see demand destruction due to a faltering economy, but there are a lot of folks in India and China who are becoming first-time car owners and each vehicle will need fuel) and you have a recipe for upward-spiraling prices. Don't look for this to change anytime soon, if ever.

Take care.
DAL357

Sunday, June 1, 2008

Hitting (relatively) close to home


Although my wife and I did not know the young woman who was murdered in the story below, we did know her mother and last visited with her some years back in her home. As a father, I can only imagine the grief this horrid tragedy must be inflicting upon her family. (The photo to the right is of victim and murderer.)

*****

Gendernalik killed by gunshot wound to head
by Trevor Hughes
May 30, 2008

Valerie Gendernalik was shot on the left side of her head by a gun held close by, Larimer County Coroner's officials announced this afternoon.

Gendernalik's death was ruled a homicide, with the cause listed as "loose contact gunshot wound to left side of face."

Gendernalik's body was found by police Sunday at the apartment she shared with her live-in boyfriend, Justin Moore, at 1610 Westbridge Drive #A10, in Fort Collins. Moore is being held at the Larimer County Detention center on murder charges.

The announcement puts to rest speculation among friends of Moore and Gendernalik that her death was an accident, although they have acknowledged that the two had an at-times tempestuous relationship that sometimes became physically violent.

According to friends and family, Gendernalik and Moore had been dating for at least a year and living together for approximately six months.

Moore had an extensive criminal background, something Valerie Gendernalik thought she could help him overcome. Gendernalik was herself serving a sentence for an Oct. 31, 2007 drunken-driving arrest.

“I know she really wanted to get him up on his feet,” her brother, Alex Gendernalik, said earlier this week. “She wanted him to get in school.”

But friends and family were worried about the troubled relationship.

“Some of us had told her we weren’t so sure about him, hanging out with people he had gotten in trouble with in the past,” Alex Gendernalik said. “But I wanted to like her boyfriend. I wanted her to be happy.”

*****

Such a waste.

I know what you are probably thinking. That the victim shared some responsibility for the events that transpired, and you are, of course, correct, at least according to this version of the story. I'm not sure what it is about losers that attracts intelligent young women, but this story is not unique. Sometimes they eventually get a clue that just loving a person is not enough and move on with their lives; sometimes they never wise up and waste their lives on unworthy scum. Then there are stories with tragic endings like this where the woman never gets a second chance to see the light.

If I could give one bit of advice to the young women of the world, it is this: Don't be so egotistical as to think that you have the power to change anyone. Influence, possibly, especially when dealing with a child. But change an adult, never. Change comes from within a person, not from without. That old maxim that "A man convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still" will be true as long as humans exist. Trying to change a loser into a winner is tantamount to changing lead into gold. In other words, it can't be done. If you want to accomplish something worthwhile, go climb a mountain, get an education, learn a new skill. But don't take on the impossible task of changing a reprobate; he will only abuse you for your efforts and leave you disillusioned and bitter. Or worse.

Take care.
DAL357

Saturday, May 31, 2008

The blue collar/poor getting bent over an oil barrel


Aside from the fact that this piece could benefit from the attention of a good editor (it tends to wander and it should be more concise), its author does have some excellent points about the reaction of the masses to ever-increasing fuel prices. I also think he nailed the intelligence, or lack thereof, and mindset of blue collar/poor folk. (The blue collar/poor live on a perceptual versus a conceptual level; they always have and always will. That's a big part of the reason why they are blue collar/poor. They're not bad people when compared to, say, criminals, but after having supervised them for eleven years, I view most of them as little more than bipedal organisms devoid of any interests beyond sports, alcohol/drugs, junk food, empty sex, gossip, and goldbricking. Hey, I come from that background, although I've tried to lift myself a bit higher than it, so if you don't like my criticism, tough.)

Here's the link to the piece, followed by a few excerpts from it. How Will Gas Prices affect the Blue Collar/Poor.

*****

There is a lot of talk about how gas prices affect stock brokers, middle-class homeowners, corporations, and people who can afford Hummers. But how much can the blue collar/poor take? Where do they stand in all this? What are their views on the gas prices? Will they eventually start rioting? What will make them riot?

Now we must not take into consideration the science, the geology of Peak Oil nor take into account the price of a barrel of oil when discussing blue collar/poor people's view on oil. The only thing that affects them is price. They have been trained to be consumers, they view themselves as consumers. They view this problem in terms of consumption. All they see and feel with their hands empirically is that they are having less money to spend on things they want like vacations, four-wheelers, new car stereos, and intoxicants. They see that their raises have stopped coming or not being as large. They can see that their employers are trying to get by with less employees.

They do not concern themselves with stocks or geology. This is not because of America's education system or even because of apathy particular to the American character. There is no point in history where the workers and peasants were intellectual geniuses. [Emphasis DAL357.] The fact that they know how to read is a first in human history. If we had a limitless supply of resources perhaps in two hundred years they could have advanced to the point of being rational, empirical and logical. (Probably not though, if there were limitless or alternative resources for 200 years the world would probably end up being completely owned by Wal-Mart.)...also...20 percent of American adults do not know how to read above a fifth grade level.

The Blue Collar/Poor View: There are three main views.

1. Gas prices are so high because corporations are doing it to make a profit. They do not understand economics and that the ways to make a profit are through cheaper machinery, cheaper labor, advertising, and coupons. It is absurd to raise the price of a product by 100 percent in one year. That will only cause a decrease in sales. Most blue collar/poor have no idea how capitalism works.

2. There is oil in Alaska and in the gulf and “tree-huggers” will not let us use it. Even though the science shows that there isn't that much oil there and it is expensive to get it out and refine.

3. I have heard many white males say that it is because of the blacks in Nigeria and the Arabs who hate American freedom. (The racist theory of oil prices.)

*

Why gas prices are so high is abstract, too distant. Blue collar/poor people live small lives, very empirical lives. They are trained since they are little by their blue collar/poor parents to only care about what is around them. It must be noted that that the blue collar/poor way of life does not require thought or truth. They grow up in public school getting told what to do, their parents tell them what to do, then they get a job where they are told what to do. It is not a necessity to read above a fifth grade reading level. If there is any reading at the blue collar job it is usually in one or two word phrases. A trucker looks at the address, the cook looks at the food ordered. There are no paragraphs to be understood, no three page memos to be read. We have to recognize that reading a single word is different than reading a sentence. A single word is an object. A sentence is a thought. Their jobs do not require thought. Why they are not a thinking/analyzing people comes directly from their environment.

*

Blue collar/poor rely on television like 1250 A.D. Europeans relied on the church. The television tells them what to do, what to think, what to purchase. They go to the television seeking answers on love, relationships, family, work, what kind of hand soap to use, what shoes to wear, where to buy lumber, what outfits look the best, how to cut their hair. We have to view the television's influence on blue collar/poor people's lives like Islam is to the Arab. The television completely engulfs their existence. We know from Communist countries that people do not react well when their religion is taken away. But unlike religion television can't be practiced in secret locations.

*****

Although some of his facts seem a bit off, he does have an excellent grasp of the psychology/incomplete thinking of the blue collar/poor.

Take care.
DAL357

Rapid movie review: Iron Man


The son and I went to view the latest sign of intellectual deterioration in this country, the recently-released "Iron Man," a couple of weeks ago. (Okay, maybe the "intellectual deterioration" comment wasn't fair, at least for this particular piece.) Considering the genre, it was actually a pretty decent movie, mainly due to Robert Downey Jr.'s performance as the title character. The movie did drag a bit in the beginning, but it picked up the pace as it progressed.

If you have kids, they'll probably like the flick, as did my seven-year-old boy, and taking your kids to see this movie is really the only reason any adult should be in the theater. Well, that plus that delicious theater popcorn (sans, of course, the Pennzoil lubricant they pump on it upon request with heedless abandon...YUCK!).

Take care.
DAL357

P.S. Although I've known of her for some time, I never really took notice of Gwyneth Paltrow before. Sheesh, she is terminally cute in this movie!

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Sign o' the times


You know money must be getting tight when people are resorting to eating this.


*****

Sales of Spam rise as consumers trim food costs

By EMILY FREDRIX, AP Business WriterWed May 28, 4:06 PM ET

Love it, hate it or laugh at it — at least it's inexpensive.

Sales of Spam — that much maligned meat — are rising as consumers are turning more to lunch meats and other lower-cost foods to extend their already stretched food budgets.

What was once cheeky, silly and the subject of a musical (as Monty Python mocked the meat in a can), is now back on the table as people turn to the once-snubbed meat as costs rise, analysts say.

Food prices are increasing faster than they've risen since 1990, at 4 percent in the U.S. last year, according to the Agriculture Department. Many staples are rising even faster, with white bread up 13 percent last year, bacon up 7 percent and peanut butter up 9 percent.

There's no sign of a slowdown. Food inflation is running at an annualized rate of 6.1 percent as of April, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Spam's maker, Hormel Foods Corp., reported last week that it saw strong sales of Spam in the second quarter, helping push up its profits 14 percent. According to sales information coming from Hormel, provided by The Nielsen Co., Spam sales were up 10.6 percent in the 12-week period ending May 3, compared to last year. In the last 24 weeks, sales were up nearly 9 percent.


*****

Oh well, I guess it's better than starving. I have nothing against SPAM for camping trips, hunting trips, etc., but I think I'd rather go vegetarian than eat it regularly. YMMV.


Take care.
DAL357

Monday, May 26, 2008

We, the oblivious


Wouldn't it be something if the candidates displayed this much insight into the massive problems now battering America and addressed the following points squarely and honestly while campaigning? Please read the following op/ed piece to reference what I'm talking about.

*****


Wake Up, America. We're Driving Toward Disaster.
By James Howard Kunstler
Washington Post, Sunday, May 25, 2008


Everywhere I go these days, talking about the global energy predicament on the college lecture circuit or at environmental conferences, I hear an increasingly shrill cry for "solutions." This is just another symptom of the delusional thinking that now grips the nation, especially among the educated and well-intentioned.


I say this because I detect in this strident plea the desperate wish to keep our "Happy Motoring" utopia running by means other than oil and its byproducts. But the truth is that no combination of solar, wind and nuclear power, ethanol, biodiesel, tar sands and used French-fry oil will allow us to power Wal-Mart, Disney World and the interstate highway system -- or even a fraction of these things -- in the future. We have to make other arrangements.


The public, and especially the mainstream media, misunderstands the "peak oil" story. It's not about running out of oil. It's about the instabilities that will shake the complex systems of daily life as soon as the global demand for oil exceeds the global supply. These systems can be listed concisely:


The way we produce food


The way we conduct commerce and trade


The way we travel


The way we occupy the land


The way we acquire and spend capital


And there are others: governance, health care, education and more.


As the world passes the all-time oil production high and watches as the price of a barrel of oil busts another record, as it did last week, these systems will run into trouble. Instability in one sector will bleed into another. Shocks to the oil markets will hurt trucking, which will slow commerce and food distribution, manufacturing and the tourist industry in a chain of cascading effects. Problems in finance will squeeze any enterprise that requires capital, including oil exploration and production, as well as government spending. These systems are all interrelated. They all face a crisis. What's more, the stress induced by the failure of these systems will only increase the wishful thinking across our nation.


And that's the worst part of our quandary: the American public's narrow focus on keeping all our cars running at any cost. Even the environmental community is hung up on this. The Rocky Mountain Institute has been pushing for the development of a "Hypercar" for years -- inadvertently promoting the idea that we really don't need to change.


Years ago, U.S. negotiators at a U.N. environmental conference told their interlocutors that the American lifestyle is "not up for negotiation." This stance is, unfortunately, related to two pernicious beliefs that have become common in the United States in recent decades. The first is the idea that when you wish upon a star, your dreams come true. (Oprah Winfrey advanced this notion last year with her promotion of a pop book called "The Secret," which said, in effect, that if you wish hard enough for something, it will come to you.) One of the basic differences between a child and an adult is the ability to know the difference between wishing for things and actually making them happen through earnest effort.


The companion belief to "wishing upon a star" is the idea that one can get something for nothing. This derives from America's new favorite religion: not evangelical Christianity but the worship of unearned riches. (The holy shrine to this tragic belief is Las Vegas.) When you combine these two beliefs, the result is the notion that when you wish upon a star, you'll get something for nothing. This is what underlies our current fantasy, as well as our inability to respond intelligently to the energy crisis.


These beliefs also explain why the presidential campaign is devoid of meaningful discussion about our energy predicament and its implications. The idea that we can become "energy independent" and maintain our current lifestyle is absurd. So is the gas-tax holiday. (Which politician wants to tell voters on Labor Day that the holiday is over?) The pie-in-the-sky plan to turn grain into fuel came to grief, too, when we saw its disruptive effect on global grain prices and the food shortages around the world, even in the United States. In recent weeks, the rice and cooking-oil shelves in my upstate New York supermarket have been stripped clean.


So what are intelligent responses to our predicament? First, we'll have to dramatically reorganize the everyday activities of American life. We'll have to grow our food closer to home, in a manner that will require more human attention. In fact, agriculture needs to return to the center of economic life. We'll have to restore local economic networks -- the very networks that the big-box stores systematically destroyed -- made of fine-grained layers of wholesalers, middlemen and retailers.


We'll also have to occupy the landscape differently, in traditional towns, villages and small cities. Our giant metroplexes are not going to make it, and the successful places will be ones that encourage local farming.


Fixing the U.S. passenger railroad system is probably the one project we could undertake right away that would have the greatest impact on the country's oil consumption. The fact that we're not talking about it -- especially in the presidential campaign -- shows how confused we are. The airline industry is disintegrating under the enormous pressure of fuel costs. Airlines cannot fire any more employees and have already offloaded their pension obligations and outsourced their repairs. At least five small airlines have filed for bankruptcy protection in the past two months. If we don't get the passenger trains running again, Americans will be going nowhere five years from now.


We don't have time to be crybabies about this. The talk on the presidential campaign trail about "hope" has its purpose. We cannot afford to remain befuddled and demoralized. But we must understand that hope is not something applied externally. Real hope resides within us. We generate it -- by proving that we are competent, earnest individuals who can discern between wishing and doing, who don't figure on getting something for nothing and who can be honest about the way the universe really works.


James Howard Kunstler is the author, most recently, of "World Made by Hand," a novel about America's post-oil future.



*****


I can't say I'm totally convinced about the Peak Oil Theory just yet, but it is something that bears serious, substantive discussion. All I know is that current oil production is not meeting (and perhaps cannot meet) demand and that's cause for great concern.


Take care.
DAL357

Memorial Day

If I recall correctly, Memorial Day's original purpose was to honor those who fell in battle for America, a purpose which has since been usurped by Veteran's Day. Today, Memorial Day can be a day to honor/remember both fallen soldiers AND family and friends who have gone on ahead of us. I know that I'll be heading to the cemetary sometime today to honor my mother's memory, for she truly was a person worthy of honor and respect, and I miss her dearly. I always will.

Take care.
DAL357

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Ours is not to reason why, ours is just grow or die


Long ago, when I was in my teens, I remember remarking to an acquaintance about how our economy was/is built upon a grow-or-die model. This is fine if it’s natural growth, but it seems we have growth artificially stimulated via interest rates, taxes, and other incentives.

Producers, of course, like growth, but they only have the power of persuasion through marketing and advertising to attempt to keep it going. When we get to politicians*, however, we get to the real culprits. Because of their penchant for giving unearned money to the least productive elements of society, and of financing unnecessary pet projects for their home districts, and myriad other wastes of hard-earned capital, we have inflation, the bane of the welfare state, and the real impetus for never-ending growth.

With this in mind, is it any wonder why this incessant focus on growth is so important to the powers that be? Without growth, the steamroller of liabilities politicians have created that’s always just two steps behind the economy would overtake and crush it. With this sword of Damocles hanging over the economy, the normal rhythms, the ebb and flow, of an economy must be suppressed at all costs.

In any free, unfettered economy, if you could find one in the Western world today, natural, healthy up-and-down cycles occur over a given period of time. The down-cycle is just as necessary as the up-cycle, for the down-cycle gives time to gain perspective, marshal resources, and cull weak businesses and bad debt, thereby making the entire system stronger and more resilient. When the down-cycle is not allowed to function, the entire system is weakened in the end, although artificially prolonging the up-cycle may obscure that fact for a while. But the down-cycle can’t be suppressed forever, and when it does reassert itself, the effects will be brutal and the entire system less able to tread water until better times, which can/will result in a death spiral to a depression if further measures are taken by politicians to prematurely get back to the up-cycle.

Do you remember the massive fires in Yellowstone National Park that occurred in the late 1980s? These fires were so intense that no amount of effort by firefighters could stop them; they were forced to let the fires burn themselves out. Do you know why the fires occurred? Because of many decades of a US Forest Service policy to quickly extinguish any and all fires, which on the surface seemed fine, but in reality allowed underbrush to get so thick that when a fire did start in overgrown areas, it would be too hot and strong for any human effort to handle. This is exactly what happened, and the resulting conflagration destroyed old-growth trees which might have made it through milder fires, leaving thousands of acres that resemble the moon’s surface (I’ve been there and I've seen it with my own four eyes).

Now, extrapolate what you’ve just read and apply it to an economy that’s never allowed to have smaller, debris-clearing fires. What do you think will happen when, someday, a fire starts in an economy weakened by government interference? If you said, “Far more devastation than would have happened had the natural cycles been allowed to function,” you get it. If you didn’t reach this conclusion, you need to think more deeply; you also need to stay away from the voting booth this November, because you’re likely to do more harm than good.

Take care.
DAL357

*I’m not letting those who voted for the politicians off of the hook. An electorate that believes in a candidate's promises/abilities to circumvent reality is, ultimately, at the root of the problem.

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Overlooked treasure


You know you have too many guns (yes, this is possible, and it's also relative) when you have forgotten how sweet a well-tuned S&W Model 19 handles because you've been busy with other shootin' irons. After a silhouette match last Saturday, I put 50 rounds of my .38 Spl. handloads through this great gun and was instantly reminded of what a pleasure it is to use. The gun points naturally, it's balanced, easy to shoot, and accurate.


I traded another gun (4" S&W Model 25 in .45 Colt) for this one some years back and I've never regretted it. The Model 25 was a fine gun too, but its large frame didn't fit my hand nearly as well as the 4" Model 19 does, and, to be honest, the .45 Colt cartridge recoiled a bit much for my tastes, although I have no problem with the recoil of my 1911 in .45 ACP.


Whoever owned the gun before had an exquisite job done on the trigger; I could be wrong, but I doubt it came from the factory in its present form. According to my research, the gun was made in the mid 1980s, so I guess it could have come from the factory with such a great trigger, but if I had to bet I'd wager that it has some post-factory work in it. The trigger is smoooooth and it doesn't stack at all. It definitely puts my late-'80s Python to shame with its factory trigger, which ain't bad, but nothing like the Model 19.


If you ever get a chance to acquire (legally, of course) a S&W Model 19, do NOT hesitate, jump on it--immediately! I doubt you'll regret it, but if you do, they are in high enough demand that you should get your money back quickly by selling it. The 19 is the the pinnacle of functionality and finesse in a revolver and all true revolver fans should still be lamenting its passing from production.


Take care.
DAL357

P.S. The photo shows an example of a Model 19, not my particular gun, nor is that my hand holding it.